The practice acquires new client leads through several channels: Zocdoc, a third-party booking platform; the company's official website via Google Ads campaigns and organic search outreach; and an interactive chat feature embedded on the website.
↓
Major Issues:
• Website → Zoho: Integration is unreliable, described as "glitchy" and prone to "keeps dropping," requiring ongoing maintenance from a web developer.
• Zocdoc → Zoho: Leads frequently require manual transcription into Zoho CRM when automated integrations fail or are absent.
• Chat → Zoho: Outside business hours, chat defaults to a contact form, requiring manual follow-up.
↓
Zoho CRM serves as the primary system for tracking all incoming leads and managing the progression of potential clients through the sales funnel. The intake team guides them through stages like verifying insurance coverage, scheduling an initial evaluation, and assigning a therapist.
↓
Time-consuming process:
• Upon intake, insurance verification is performed manually by accessing various insurance company portals to confirm eligibility and benefits.
• Screenshots are uploaded into Therapy Appointment for billing reference.
• Aron confirmed this is a manual process, with interest in integrating an eligibility checking system.
↓
Critical Issue:
• One-way sync between Therapy Appointment and Google Calendar: updates in Therapy Appointment reflect in Google Calendar, but changes in Google Calendar do not update Therapy Appointment.
• This leads to double bookings and scheduling conflicts, costing "thousands of dollars" in lost clients.
↓
Reminder System Issues:
• High incidence of no-shows for initial evaluations due to limited reminder capabilities in Therapy Appointment.
• Zoho's mass texting is hampered by poor data flow from Therapy Appointment, leading to manual texting by the intake team.